Author:
G.
Campatelli , A. Scippa
Department
of Mechanical Engineering and Industrial Technologies, University of Firenze –
Italy, Via di S. Marta, 3, 50139 Firenze, Italy
Abstract
In High Pressure Die Casting (HPDC),
geometrical distortions usually happen during the cooling phase, due to the
reduced cooling time and the high thermal gradient inside the product itself.
This phenomenon affects most the thin walled products. The usual die design
practice considers only the linear shrinking of the product during the cooling
as a consequence of the difficult to take in account also the geometrical
deformations. In this essay a simple finite element design strategy that allows
the designer to improve the die shape is presented. The proposed approach uses
an automatic iterative optimization tech-nique based on a heuristic algorithm,
which could be easily applied to most of the Finite Element (FE) commercial
software: the basic concept of the method is simply to move the nodes defining
the die surface in the opposite direction to the error due to the cooling
phenomena. An automotive component has been selected as a case study: the aim
was to improve the planarity tolerance of a planar surface of the casted
product. Results show the efficiency of the proposed method that, despite its
simplicity, is able to provide an optimal solution with a small number of
iterations.
Introduction
For many metal components,
with perhaps the exception of some powder forming process, the part can rarely
be finished exactly to the required final tolerance in a single forming
operation. Thus, in general, a forming operation is carried out to produce a ‘near-net-shape’
product, which is subsequently brought into the required tolerance by a
finishing operation.
In aluminum casting, High
Pressure Die Casting (HPDC) is used when high productivity and good quality of
the rough product is required. Both productivity and reduction of finishing
operations (neat shape or near net shape processes) allow a heavy reduction in
the product manufacturing cost.
.
The mechanical properties of a die-cast
product are related principally to the die temperature, the metal velocity at
the gate, and the applied casting pressure. The integrity of the cast component
is affected by: the combination of die’s thermal profile, mold filling capacity
of the molten metal, geometrical complexity of the parts and cooling rate
during die casting. The pressure applied to the casting during solidification
is crucial to the production of high integrity parts. Porosity reduces with
increasing intensification pressure, but enlarges with increasing casting
velocity. If these parameters are not controlled adequately, various defects
within the finished component will be generated.
The main drawbacks of HPDC are the porosity
and the deformation of the product during the cooling phase of the material.
During the solidification phase, the natural casting shrinkage, constrained by
the presence of the die, force the component to stretch plastically: this
produce residual stresses and complex springback during the cooling phase
subsequent to the extraction of the product from the die.
Usually the die’s shape
design process takes into account only the thermal shrinkage of the product
without considering the geometrical deformation that could arise due to the
temperature gradients in the product during the cooling phase. Most of the die
designers start from the geometry of the final product and ‘‘scale’’ this
geometry using the thermal shrinking coefficient of the material using the
company knowhow or a very expensive and time consuming trial-and-error
approach. This usually takes place during the die try-out stage in a
manufacturing plant, when the die has to be repaired or re-manufactured. The
method is highly dependent upon the skill, experience, and luck of those
carrying out the procedure.
The general aim is to
provide some guideline for the building up of Finite Element (FE) simulation of
the cooling phase for a HPDC product and to present an algorithm for the
automated optimization of the die geometry, using commercial FE software. It is
a heuristic method, based on the difference between the work piece after
cooling and the desired shape. No parameterisation of the die geometry is
needed: since no parameters are used to describe the shape of the die geometry,
it can be modified in an arbitrary way without the restriction of the design
space spanned by design parameters.
Proposed approach
Assuming that the deformed
shape due to cooling can be predicted accurately, there still remains the
problem of how to use such results to obtain a suitable die design able to meet
the required tolerances. That is, the cooling predictions allow ‘‘forward’’
analysis, while a ‘‘backward’’ analysis is needed to obtain, from these
results, an optimized die design. The proposed approach is based on iteratively
comparing a target part shape with the FE simulated part shape after cooling.
The displacement vectors at each node are used to adjust the trial die design
until the target part geometry is achieved. Thus, the results from one cooling
simulation give the input for the next iteration. By making the geometry
changes on the FE description of the work piece, new die geometry is directly
obtained for the next cooling simulation.
The
proposed strategy is based on four phases:
1. Hypothesis of the thermal map of the product before the cooling
phase; this could be obtained from the study of similar product (company
experience), from technical consideration or by FE simulation of the casting
and cooling inside the die.
2. Hypothesis of the heat transfer parameters during cooling: fluid
type and temperature, geometry of the product and its orientation in the
cooling bath.
3. Determination
of the cold product geometry and residual stresses by means of FE simulation.
4. Iterative
design process to define the optimized die geometry able to meet the tolerances
required for the final product.
Setting up the FE
simulation
Distortions are
basically the result of the temperature gradient inside the piece, the
constrained shrinkage during the solidification phase, and the high thermal
shock due to the cooling phase: therefore it is necessary to perform a coupled
thermal stress analysis. The thermal stress calculation procedure is as
follows:
For a coupled
thermal-stress problem, important topics are:
– the
time integration scheme;
– the
appropriate integration time step;
– defining both mechanical and thermal
properties, using a mechanical constitutive model that allows entry of a
thermal coefficient of expansion and mechanical properties that are function of
temperature;
–
realistic boundary conditions;
In
a coupled thermal-stress analysis, the thermal time step is independent from
the mechanical time step. The rate of mechanical motion, mechanical
deformation, and rate of heat transfer must all be considered in selecting an
appropriate time step.
Heat transfer
coefficients
To
set up a realistic simulation is necessary to provide the heat transfer
coefficients for all the phases of the cooling (opening of the die, transport
of the product to the cooling bath, etc.), and the thermal map of the work piece
at the beginning of the cooling process. This last one can be evaluated knowing
the heat transfer from the material to the die, which is usually cooled by
water circulation. Some foundry software can provide such information. The heat
transfer can be calculated knowing the orientation of the product during
transportation and cooling in the bath and the external thermal condition. The
approximations of the heat transfer coefficients and of the thermal map
constitute the greatest source of error in the simulation.
Conclusions
The
method for die geometry compensation has shown to produce a die shape which
minimizes the product geometrical error such as planarity. This approach could
highly reduce the errors that are generated by the simple die design at nominal
geometry or compensated only for uniform shrinkage. The method is characterized
by a very short response time : only few cooling simulations are needed and the
FE model developed has a very high convergence rate. Moreover the algorithm developed
to obtain the optimal die geometry, has proven to be very efficient and
consists in an iterative procedure that eliminate the trial-and-error
optimization by the use of a Matlab_ script that automatically run a sequence
of iterations in order to get the final die shape. The different stages in the
iteration, i.e., deviation calculation and result mapping are solved by
programs written solely for these purposes.
The
main advantages of the method are:
–
The high generality, so it can easily be applied for modeling other
manufacturing processes (e.g. extrusion, welding, sandcasting).
–
The ease of implementation that make it easily applicable to most of commercial
FE software.
–
The excellent convergence rate of the FE simulation, which results in very
short response time.
–
It is possible to separate the filling phase optimization and the tolerance
optimization.
The
critical parameters for obtaining a coherent solution are the heat transfer
coefficient and the initial thermal map
And
the most careful care has to be used for the evaluation of these
characteristics in order to obtain a realistic FE simulation and it is most
likely that the method will work on a variety of different shapes.
I found here lots of great information about Pressure Die Casting and conclusions. your explanation is really so appreciate.
ReplyDeleteExcellent post! I must thank you for this informative read. I hope you will post again soon.High Pressure Diecasting Parts Manufacturers.
ReplyDeleteExcellent post! I must thank you for this informative read. I hope you will post again soon.HPDC Pressure Die Casting Components Exporters.
ReplyDeletezinc die casting
ReplyDeleteI really enjoyed a lot.This blog is very nice.Awesome Post.
Thanks and keep sharing such valuable updates through your side.
ReplyDeleteAlu die casting
Hi, what a great web blog. I usually spend hours on the net reading blogs on various subjects. And, I really would like to praise you for writing such a fabulous article
ReplyDeleteplastic mold company